Why Pneumiatrists Are Smarter Than Psychiatrists

Here are just a few reasons why pneumiatrists (students of pneumiatry [pronounced “new-my-uh-tree”]) are smarter than psychiatrists:

  1. All pneumiatrists are psychiatrists.
  2. All pneumiatrists study all sciences.
  3. All pneumiatrists believe that atheism is both scientifically and psychiatrically unsound.
  4. All pneumiatrists believe in the existence of the God of the Bible.
  5. Most nonpneumiatrist psychiatrists suffer from mental illness, ranging from neurotic to disturbed to psychotic.
  6. Pneumiatrists believe that human beings have both vitalistic (“free will”) and mechanistic (“machine”) aspects (“parts” [note quotes]), while most psychiatrists believe than human beings are nothing more than “machines.”
  7. Pneumiatrists use more evidence and facts than psychiatrists.
  8. Pneumiatrists recognize the tripartite nature of man. Psychiatry only recognizes two of the three facets (“parts” [note quotes]) of man.
  9. Pneumiatrists inform and support Sane Majority and their Mental Health Rules: Sanity Manifesto 7.0 Beta.

We have published over 10,000 reasons why pneumiatrists are smarter than psychiatrists (see our book Pneumiatrists Are Smarter [link not active yet] for a list and explanation of all of these over 10,000 reasons).

Pneumiatry Versus Psychiatry

Pneumiatry teaches you how to keep your sanity. Psychiatry teaches you nothing.

Psychiatry is actually a collection of competing groups. These groups, in effect, do not agree with each other about anything.

Pneumiatry has a 100% success rate.

Psychiatry has a 0% success rate though it has been used by the legal system to help to keep many murderous psychopaths off the streets.

Pure Science: Pneumiatric Psychiatry

Pneumiatric psychiatry is the only psychiatry that is pure science.

Super Evidence-Based: Pneumiatric Psychiatry

Pneumiatric psychiatry is super evidenced-based.  What do we mean?

  1. Pneumiatric psychiatry is evidence-based.
  2. Pneumiatric psychiatry is massively evidence-based in every particular.
  3. Pneumiatric psychiatry is intelligibly evidence-based in every particular.

Why God Is A Part Of Psychiatry

God is a part of psychiatry, psychology, psychotherapy, psychoanalysis, and all of the other behavioral sciences and behavioral quasisciences because they all include the concept of the theos (see http://uspsych.org/2012/06/20/a-theos-is-something-with) and God is one example of a theos.

Whether God is the supreme (best) theos is beyond the scope, arguably (it can be argued both ways), of the mind sciences (behavioral sciences, which include psychiatric science, not psychiatry, and behavioral quasisciences, which include psychiatry).  I will say, in passing, that I believe that God is the supreme theos and I explain at American Theists why I believe this to be the case.

God Versus The Collective Unconscious

God is the God of the Bible.  The collective unconscious is a generalizing concept based on mountains of empirical, psychological data.

Both God and the collective unconscious share all of the same attributes.  Therefore, they are one and the same.  To be clear, the biblical description of God is the full description of God.

Now, reality is the intention (actually, intentions) of God.  Therefore, it is also correct to say that reality is the “intention” (note quotes [indicating “virtual intention” since, by definition, the collective unconscious is not a being {more elsewhere <see The “Bisconti Jung Proof”> and later}]) of the collective unconscious.

Sodomite: Gayprac

A sodomite is a Gayprac.

Straights Versus Normstraights

Straights are people who are not a member of the imaginary sexual group called “Gays.”

Normstraights are people who are not sodomites (Gaypracs).

It is more helpful to talk about normstraights than about straights.

Smart Combat – Gaypracs

Criticize the sexual activity of Gaypracs and not the imaginary sexual group called “Gays.”  In doing so, you will avoid many problems and have greater victories!

Gayprac Marriage

Gaypracs are sexual peverts; so, of course, they are not allowed to marry or join in civil unions for that matter.

People Who Call Themselves “Gay”

We do not criticize imaginary groups of people.  This includes the imaginary group of people called “Gays.”

Now, people who call themselves “Gay” are actually Gaypracs (see http://uspsych.org/2012/05/25/gays-versus-gaypracs/).  Gaypracs are sexual perverts and suffer from a mental illness (for example, homoneurosis or homopsychosis).  They also exhibit a moral deficiency.

Mind Versus Brain

The mind and the brain are not the same thing.  Now, of course, there are two schools of thought on whether the mind and the brain are the same thing.  However, as we shall show, unlike anywhere else, the mind and the brain are two distinct entities.

You Can Understand Mental Health

We explain mental health subjects and arenas, including psychology and psychiatry, so that anyone can understand them.  Don’t let any mental health professional tell you or lead you to believe that mental health is beyond your understanding!

Corrected DSM-V: DSM-V-PA

As soon as possible, we will be posting our corrected version of the evil DSM-V.  We have titled our corrected version the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-V With Pneumiatric Annotations and DSM-V-PA.  It includes the entire text of the DSM-V.  See “DSMs” in our menu above.

Pimhead

Pimhead, the Pneumiatric Mental Health Dictionary, also known as the Dictionary of Pneumiatric Psychiatry, is the largest and most advanced dictionary of psychiatry in the world.  Pimhead will be found on the L. F. Nexus Think Tank website at http://lfnexus.com/pneumiatric.mental.health.dictionary.htm.  We will be porting Pimhead for use here on the UPAX website as soon as possible.

PS: APAXO’s American Psychiatric Glossary is a baby work by comparison.

Overturning of the “Strategic Policy Shift”

Based on the criminal nature of the DSM-V, we now, once again, totally reject the American Psychiatric Association.  Therefore, we overturn the “Strategic Policy Shift.”  For details see the latter part of http://uspsych.org/2012/05/04/pneumiatric-psychiatry/.

Where To Find The 99+% Referenced In The Just Prior Post

See “…the vast majority also have heterosexual experience—less than 1% do not….” on page 16 of http://uspsych.org/TheTrojanCouchSatinover.pdf.

A Simple Proof That Gays Don’t Exist

Gays are supposed to have “a genetic makeup that compels them to have sex with people of the same gender.”  However, more than 99% of people who call themself “Gay” also have sex with people of the opposite gender (see page 16 of http://uspsych.org/TheTrojanCouchSatinover.pdf and Footnote 1 below).  So much for the “compels…sex with…the same gender.”  The compulsion is disproven; therefore, the Gayness is disproven.

Footnote 1:  “…the vast majority also have heterosexual experience—less than 1% do not….”  See page 16 of http://uspsych.org/TheTrojanCouchSatinover.pdf.  This is quoted by Dr. Satinover from the work by Laumann et al., p. 311.

Footnote 2:  The “less than 1%” (see Footnote 1 above) are indeterminate and, therefore, do not support the classification of “Gay.”

Footnote 3:  There are those who would try to refute this article by drawing you into a jargon discussion.  Just remember that anyone who cannot explain their jargon to you is a fraud.

The Pracs

What distinguishes the PracsGaypracs, Lesbianpracs, Bisexualpracs, Transgenderpracs, and Questioningpracs – from the imaginary sexual groups – Gays, Lesbians, Bisexuals, Transgenders, and Questioning – is that they are not born with an (imaginary) genetic makeup that compels them to engage in a particular type of sexual activity.

Other Imaginary Groups

Other imaginary groups include Lesbians, Bisexuals, Transgenders, and Questioning.  We never criticize imaginary things; so, we never criticize these imaginary groups.

However, we do criticize Lesbianpracs, Bisexualpracs, Transgenderpracs, and Questioningpracs.  These, along with Gaypracs, are sexual perverts.

Criticism of Gaypracs

We have criticized, do criticize, and will criticize Gaypracs but, remember, Gaypracs are not the imaginary group of people that some refer to as “Gays.”  We never criticize anything imaginary, including the imaginary group of people that some refer to as “Gays.”

What If Gays Existed?

If Gays existed, we would support them because they would have been created that way by God but there is no evidence that they exist.

Now, what people call “Gays” are actually Gaypracs (see http://uspsych.org/2012/05/25/gays-versus-gaypracs/ for the scientific definitions of “Gay” and “Gayprac”).